Home > Glossary > Veritas Competitors and Alternatives in 2024

Veritas Competitors and Alternatives in 2024

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars
(15 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
Updated 22nd January 2024, Rob Morrison

Veritas NetBackup (formerly Symantec NetBackup, now from Veritas Technologies) allows users to manage and configure backups to and from different platforms, such as virtual, physical and cloud environments. It can be used with common storage devices, such as disk, tape and the cloud, all from a centralized administration and configuration console.


Is your backup system secure?

veritas competitors

Veritas Features

  • Simple and friendly administration, which offers operation and administration functionalities to users with different levels of expertise in the technology, for example a management or analytics user typically does not handle the same terms and concepts as the platform backup administrator of the organization.
  • Reliability to guarantee that the activities executed during the management of the backup are performed in an integrated and complete manner, without loss or inconsistencies in the data and information.
  • Adaptability to heterogeneous operation environments: this includes servers, storage devices, local and remote resources, etc. Alternative competitor solutions to Veritas should take advantage of all existing resources in a company, and use them according to its needs and requirements.
  • Ability to grow in conjunction with the company, adapting to the new requirements of information and operation of the processes, as well as those generated by users.
  • Easy integration to the technology platform of the organization, such as network operation features, notification notifications and repositories of management information, among others.
  • The possibility of making backups of different levels that readily accommodate the policies and operational needs of a company. Besides its traditional competitors, Veritas alternative should create and make use of new technical and management approaches in it departments that further optimize the configuration and execution of backups.
  • Streamlining the configuration activities of the different levels of backups in the organization, not only at the moment of their creation, but as changes occur due to new requirements or some adjustment in the operation and execution of the same. Although it is an activity commonly used in backup solutions, Veritas competitors should facilitate both their configuration and their implementation into a production environment.
  • Feasibility to store historical backup data in different repositories in an easily accessible manner with  appropriate levels of security and access, so that it can be used for various purposes, such as:
    • Restoring data and information.
    • Meeting legal regulations.
    • Compliance with standards, such as ISO, or operational methodologies, such as ITIL, or some other legal or management instrument.
  • The access and use of backup data repositories, through various tools and utilities, allows this information to be used in companies for different activities and with varied and specific objectives, such as data management, capacity planning, functional indicators and balance scorecards, among others.
  • Integration and use in mobile devices; not only for the revision of notifications and monitoring of the backup solution, but also to facilitate proactive management that allows streamlining of processes.
  • Ease of use and management of resources in the cloud. Although Veritas NetBackup supports the use of the cloud as a destination of backups in different environments including hybrids, some Veritas competitors allow especially advanced cloud backup and recovery management abilities. The use of containers is another available option.

What are the critical things your backup software should do for you?

Veritas NetBackup & Competitor Differences

Consequently, although Veritas NetBackup and its competitors share many functions in terms of configuration, administration and operation, there are differences that distinguish the latter which has encouraged their increased use today. Among these are:

  • Use of open source as an emerging technology, which allows not only access to state-of-the-art technology in constant growth, but also to be part of a community committed to participate and be part of projects, especially when these are oriented to offer solutions to diverse needs. There is typically an active and relevant engineering road-map, as well as proposing new ideas and improvement in functionality. Access to source code is often possible, an element that is highly re-assuring to some organizations that need to know exactly what they are using.
  • Cost savings in terms of defining and using the elements that make up the backup solution, such as those that control and manage resources and storage devices, both local and remote. A clear example would be the availability of subscription-based licensing, and not charging the users by data volume. These modern approaches can have an extremely beneficial effect to companies regarding cost savings.
  • The existence of multiple management tools and data repositories for managing an organization’s data backup. It is worth mentioning at this point that some applications use databases from a number of different manufacturers as data repositories, such as SQLite, MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQL Server, etc., known as catalogs, which can be managed using their own utilities.
  • Simpler growth according to the requirements and needs of the company, derived from the companies’ operating processes or their users.
  • More simple estimation of resources, not only in the technology but also for the different organizational processes of planning and management.

Veritas Competitors & Their Features

Although mentioned before, the use of resources in the cloud has undoubtedly allowed Veritas competitors to emerge, due to the multiple functionalities and benefits it offers, such as:

  • Storage of the volumes that contain the backups in remote sites, configured mostly in environments of high availability and redundancy.
  • Different providers to choose from among those offering cloud storage services, such as Amazon and Azure, and those that offer their solutions online in specific platforms managed by themselves.
  • Access from different sites and places and from any platform.
  • More adaptability and openness to agility in the operation and information requirements of organizations.
  • The measurement of resources used considering the disk space used, facilitating with this the estimation of costs that allow better resource planning of information technologies, also known as capacity planning.
  • A shared and safe environment
  • Encryption of the data, both in the process of copying the information, as well as in the volumes that contain the backups of the computers and servers.
  • Savings in operation and maintenance costs, in terms of technology management.
  • Scheme for the management of the licenses in a simpler and less complicated way. This is often with the higher levels of quality and support regarding the attention and response time to clients, in the case of a professional open source based solution. In case of using a pure open source solution, the support and the help of a wide community constitutes the fundamental reference, and in the majority of cases helps in the identification of bugs and offers suggestions and new recommendations that generally, are adapted for future versions or releases.

Among the features that Veritas NetBackup from Veritas technologies has are:

  • Backup of equipment and servers to different types of storage.
  • Backup and recovery of virtual machines.
  • Handling snapshots and archiving.
  • Implementation of deduplication algorithms for the execution of backups.
  • Integrated bare metal recovery.
  • Cipher and encryption of backups and data volumes.
  • Use of Network Data Management Protocol (NDMP) in cases of having the appropriate hardware.
  • Support for backup to cloud.
  • Functionalities for implementation in disaster recovery environments.
  • Centralized console for administration and configuration of jobs and backup policies in companies.

Over time, the emergence of new trends and technologies such as open source, together with a reduction in hardware and storage costs has encouraged the appearance of Veritas competitors applications with similar or even more functionalities. Additionally, these technologies are easily integrated to those already established, both in the backup area (snapshot, deduplication, NDMP, bare metal, virtual machines, disaster recovery, among others) and in hardware and storage (NAS, SAN, cloud, etc.).

Veritas Reviews

  • Al F.G2 – “It’s a robust system that can serve many needs. It lacks in some areas where other products have specialized. There are many IT professionals who have familiarity with the product, so resources aren’t hard to find when implementing it or researching issues with it. Their support is a little lacking for the price, but there is no shortage of information online when troubleshooting issues. You need to stay on top of the policies or this can bog down your staff trying to administer the environment as it grows. It’s a solid product and does a decent job. Having the architecture already figured out and sticking to a system works best. Its versatility is the best part about it. It can handle most of your backup needs if not all.
  • Robert H.G2 – “it is definitely a product to look at. It’s costly but most of the enterprise products out there will be just as costly when it comes down to it. The product itself does what it says and will backup nearly anything you want it to. The agents are very robust, sometimes problems can be frustrating but their support is very good and will work to help resolve any of your issues.
  • Taryn F.Capterra – “Veritas Backup Exec is a good choice for small to medium businesses with a relatively simple set up , not requiring many different agents to be backed up, and without excessive amounts of data. The licensing model is complicated and can be expensive, but I have seen changes in the options supplied now – such as the Per VM model
  • Ratnodeep Roy – TrustRadius – “Veritas NetBackup is well suited to backup huge NDMP workloads through multiplexing where tapes drives are less to accommodate, huge VMware workloads backup can be completed by leveraging SAN data transfer technology and CBT, ability to do exchange. Oracle and SQL backups even if backed up by VMware policy. Very well suited for dissimilar hardware physical server BMR restore. Flash backup for raw file system backup. It is less suited for DFSR backups, less suited for large changes of daily data, dedupe is not integrated, rather depends upon additional license like MSDP and specific hardware, configuring AIR replication is also very complex.

Veritas Competitors

In such a diverse scenario, it is not difficult to suppose that Veritas alternative applications will continue to emerge and those that exist will maintain their tendency to grow, making use of existing technological resources and new ones that are incorporated, especially in relation to:

  • Cloud storage solutions.
  • Improvements in the performance of tools such as Deduplication, and their architecture and management. Improvements and creation of new algorithms for encryption and protection of the information and the transmission channel, both for local and/or remote localities.
  • Implementation of new methodologies for the execution of backups that optimize the use of resources, for storage, CPU, bandwidth, etc., and reduce the execution times of backup and recovery operations in companies.
  • Implementation of hybrid environments in organizations, not only for the daily execution of operations but also for more freedom in the execution of projects, such as massive data migrations, environments for disaster recovery, alternate data centers, among others.

There are plenty of different competitors and alternatives to Veritas, but picking the best one for your needs can be somewhat challenging. Review aggregator websites are one of several ways to approach this issue, with centralized score-based review systems in websites such as Peerspot or Gartner being used to deliver a more objective stance on the topic. Below you’ll find 10 different examples of solutions that could be picked as Veritas alternatives in 2024:

Druva Data Resiliency Cloud

Druva Data Resiliency Cloud puts its main focus on protecting cloud-based data, be it from applications or actual cloud storage locations, Druva is distributed as-a-service and can be used to perform a variety of data-related tasks, be it backup, archival, recovery, or even compliance. Druva also has a centralized management console and can improve data visibility while also securing it as much as possible.

4.8/5 score based on 596 customer reviews

  • Advantages. Customer support as a whole receives a lot of praise, as well as the general approach to data security – with data immutability, data encryption, and many others. The overall user experience is extremely praise-worthy, and audit trails in the form of logs could be kept forever if necessary.
  • Shortcomings. The initial setup can be somewhat challenging for users that are unfamiliar with this kind of software. The restoration speed is also lower than what the competitors can offer, and backups of less common data formats such as Azure or SQL cluster and other technologies are either unavailable or are not as customizable as they could be.


Veeam Backup & Replication is often regarded as one of the most popular solutions on the entire backup and recovery software market. It is a reliable backup solution with many different features, ranging from CDP and app-aware backups to DR replication, instant recovery to NAS, granular file recovery, Exchange/SharePoint/AD support, and more.

4.6/5 score based on 1630 customer reviews

  • Advantages. Veeam Backup & Replication is surprisingly affordable for an enterprise-level backup solution, and the overall setup/management process is relatively easy. The overall versatility of the solution is one of its biggest advantages, capable of covering the overwhelming majority of different data storage types with little to no issues.
  • Shortcomings. The entire lineup of Veeam products can be confusing to newcomers, the solution itself would still be too expensive for most small businesses, and it is also impossible to save individual files for a long time period (several years). The range of different VM types supported is limited, and there can be security concerns as well


Zerto is a cloud data protection platform that operates as a software-only offering capable of reducing or eliminating a lot of different issues across physical, virtual, and hybrid systems. Zerto can be used to simplify difficult topics such as data protection, data recovery, and even data mobility for companies of all shapes and sizes.

4.7/5 score based on 206 customer reviews

  • Advantages. Zerto’s disaster recovery capabilities receive a lot of praise from customers. Its mobile app and its centralized dashboard in the form of an analytics portal are also often explained as praise-worthy. Zerto’s backup/restore speed is fast and the security of backups is top-notch.
  • Shortcomings. Zerto’s base operating system has to be Windows, there are no other options possible at the moment. This can present a security issue. The lack of app-aware backups is somewhat problematic for some users, as well as the solution’s significant price and its lack of educational materials about the UI and all the different features that Zerto offers.

Arcserve Unified Data Protection (UDP)

Arcserve UDP was presented with the intent of offering an enterprise-ready sophisticated solution without the complexity that usually comes with such solutions. It is a feature-rich backup and recovery platform backed by heterogeneous image-based technology that can cover a multitude of different data forms and storage types, from local workstations to M365, Microsoft SQL, PostgreSQL, VMware, Hyper-V, Microsoft AD, Oracle databases, and more.

4.5/5 score based on 167 customer reviews

  • Advantages. A lot of praise in Arcserve goes towards its deduplication mechanisms, as well as its ability to access backups directly/boot servers directly from their backup copies. It can also offer impressive scalability that works both upwards and downwards, making it a great option for all kinds of customers.
  • Shortcomings. Arcserve’s interface can be somewhat confusing, activation and licensing processes have a lot of issues, and there are plenty of small errors that diminish the overall experience of using the solution.

Commvault Complete Data Protection

A backup and recovery solution with three main target areas – data security, disaster recovery, and centralized management for complex systems or environments. It can create backups of operating systems, applications, and databases, supports virtual, physical, and hybrid environments, and is a generally impressive solution in terms of its feature set.

4.5/5 score based on 449 customer reviews

  • Advantages. Commvault’s versatility receives a lot of praise, especially when it comes to protecting different types of environments. There are also plenty of positive reviews about the usefulness of the search function, as well as its general stability over the years.
  • Shortcomings. Commvault’s price is significantly above average, its deployment process is rather complicated, and its interface takes quite a lot of time getting used to.

Dell Data Protection Suite

Dell Data Protection Suite is a backup and recovery solution that was built upon the shoulders of several other Dell products, such as Dell Avamar, Dell NetWorker, and Dell PowerProtect Data Manager. It is a comprehensive data protection solution that works with many different data storage types, ranging from physical to cloud, databases, VMs, and so on.

4.8/5 score based on 916 customer reviews

  • Advantages. Dell’s solution supports most of the major OS on the market, from Windows and macOS to a number of popular Linux distributions. It is also known as a user-friendly solution that excels at regulatory compliance (as well as reporting).
  • Shortcomings. It is somewhat demanding when it comes to the system’s hardware, its customer support has plenty of criticism revolving around it, and the encryption-decryption processes are rather confusing.

Cohesity DataProtect

Cohesity’s backup solution is a sophisticated software-defined product that mostly targets cloud environments, it can offer extreme scalability to its customers, as well as an extremely thorough policy-based protection system. It works either as a service or deployed on-premise, and its RTO/RPO times are extremely impressive.

4.7/5 score based on 719 customer reviews

  • Advantages. The sheer speed of Cohesity as a backup solution is nothing if not praise-worthy, and there are also plenty of other features that receive a lot of praise, such as instant DR failover, forever incremental backup, ransomware detection, and so on.
  • Shortcomings. Some of Cohesity’s updates have to be applied manually via the command line, making the update process somewhat inconvenient – and there are also plenty of negative reviews in terms of the overall UI and the reporting capabilities.

Acronis Backup

Acronis offers one of the most comprehensive data protection solutions on the market, offering a wide coverage in terms of environment types and storage types. It can offer blockchain-based authentication, enhanced backup validation, active ransomware protection, fast RTOs, and many other advantages.

4.4/5 score based on 305 customer reviews

  • Advantages. The speed and versatility of Acronis are some of its biggest points of praise, as well as flexible administration capabilities, storage cloning, and more.
  • Shortcomings. Acronis also has somewhat unnecessary extra overhead as an on-premise solution; limited compatibility with databases and hypervisors, a simplistic reporting feature, and a sophisticated initial setup process.


NAKIVO Backup & Replication is a multifunctional data protection solution that can work with most business sizes on the market. It can perform application-aware incremental backups, as well as instant recovery operations. It can work with regular Linux/Windows environments, as well as M365, Amazon EC2, Hyper-V, VMware, Nutanix AHV, and even Oracle databases.

4.8/5 score based on 415 customer reviews

  • Advantages. NAKIVO Backup & Replication takes pride in its fast and easy initial deployment, and general backup/restore operation speed. The overall versatility in terms of supporting different storage types is also greatly appreciated.
  • Shortcomings. NAKIVO’s reports and logs are not as detailed as users would want them to be, the solution itself is far from cheap, and some features are very basic in their capabilities (SQL backup, for example).


A backup and recovery solution that acts as a centralized data management solution for all kinds of environment types, including virtual, physical, and hybrid. It can act as a great protective layer for many data types against ransomware, internal threats, and operational failures, while also offering features such as scalability and cloud integration to all of its customers.

4.8/5 score based on 682 customer reviews

  • Advantages. Some of the more common advantages of Rubrik that were noted in customer reviews are general improved management efficiency, frequent reporting, and a lot of praise towards the Live Mount feature.
  • Shortcomings. A customer’s access to the “backend” of the solution is severely limited, the pricing model becomes more and more expensive as time goes on, and reporting as a feature is not detailed enough to be effective when it comes to analyzing events or inspecting system logs.

Another notable alternative to Veritas that is worth mentioning is Bacula Enterprise – it has especially high security levels and anti-ransomware tools, yet also allows companies to significantly save costs especially in the implementation, operation and support of backup and recovery management. This is achieved using the latest technologies available combined with particularly stable code, and no charges based on data volume. Its subscription based licensing also ensures support quality which is one of the highest in the industry.

Bacula’s wide feature set applies itself readily to complicated or varied IT environments, with many different databases, hypervisors and cloud interfaces, enabling the user to consolidate their IT estates backup and recovery under a single pane of glass. This combination of features, value and high security means Bacula is a popular choice for government organizations, especially military, research laboratories and other mission-critical government organizations.


The backup and recovery solution market is vast and varied, and the competition is at all-time high. Different brands and software providers strive to become bigger and better than the competition, rolling out new features to attract more users and keep the existing ones. This kind of situation is always beneficial to customers as a whole – but figuring out a specific solution becomes a long and problematic process.

For example, our list of Veritas competitors showcases plenty of different solutions – and yet there are a lot of similarities between them all. All of them represent a massive set of features to work with, meaning that pretty much every single solution here would fit as a Veritas alternative. The customer may choose Acronis for a bigger emphasis on security, Cohesity would be the prime choice if small RPOs and RTOs are a priority, and Commvault would most likely be the solution that would last for years with little to no issues.

Bacula Enterprise also fits this explanation – an extensive multi-faceted backup solution with plenty of different features and specialties that possesses one of the biggest list of compatible storage locations on the market, as well as a host of useful features. Bacula’s offering is a likely choice for customers that are looking for a great Veritas alternative.

Download Bacula Enterprise trialCheck your backup solution essentials before choosing

About the author
Rob Morrison
Rob Morrison is the marketing director at Bacula Systems. He started his IT marketing career with Silicon Graphics in Switzerland, performing strongly in various marketing management roles for almost 10 years. In the next 10 years Rob also held various marketing management positions in JBoss, Red Hat and Pentaho ensuring market share growth for these well-known companies. He is a graduate of Plymouth University and holds an Honours Digital Media and Communications degree, and completed an Overseas Studies Program.